Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-PL3
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-PL2 and Sigma Quattro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-PL2 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the Quattro and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-PL2 matches up against the Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Sigma Quattro

 E-PL2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-PL2

 Quattro E-PL2 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016February 2011Fresher by 61 months
Display resolution1620k460kCrisper display (+1160k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Sigma Quattro

 E-PL2 Quattro 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 provides external measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-PL2 and Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL2 against the Quattro.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and Quattro is 85 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and Quattro.

As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will provide you with greater detail having an extra 17MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-PL2 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography information
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography information
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
81
focusing manually
fantastic resolution (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Street photography factors
Sigma Quattro Street photography factors
73
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (625g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography info
Sigma Quattro Sports photography info
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery power (280 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
70
fantastic resolution (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
slow fps (3.8 frames per second)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography advice
Sigma Quattro Travel photography advice
51
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
bad battery power (280 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
55
environment sealing
fantastic resolution (29MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (625 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography factors
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography factors
61
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery power (280 per charge)
no Time Lapse function
72
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
fantastic resolution (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging information
Sigma Quattro Vlogging information
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection autofocus
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic support
22
supports face detect focusing
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low ( resolution)
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (625 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Sigma Quattro
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus PEN E-PL2 Sigma sd Quattro
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-02-11 2016-02-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 29 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Available lenses 107 76
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 -
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 362 grams (0.80 lbs) 625 grams (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $0 $738