Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched August 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus E-PL6, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Photography GlossaryThe E-PL3 was revealed 3 years prior to the E-PL6 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-PL3 matches up vs the E-PL6 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus PEN E-PL6. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus E-PL6
| E-PL3 | E-PL6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus E-PL3
| E-PL6 | E-PL3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2014 |  | September 2011 | Fresher by 34 months |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus E-PL6
| E-PL3 | E-PL6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same display resolution |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 features external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL6 has sizing of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus E-PL6 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL3 vs the E-PL6.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and E-PL6 is 88 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL3 and E-PL6.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-PL6 to provide extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-PL3 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2011-09-20 | 2014-08-01 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Truepic VI | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 325g (0.72 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 360 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $300 |