Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL3 was brought out 2 years after the 9000 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-PL3 matches up against the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus 9000
E-PL3 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 29 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-PL3
9000 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus 9000
E-PL3 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 has outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL3 versus the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f134/4f134c0f778cbba19e33ef765e448e113885e5b5" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and 9000 is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc8f6/dc8f61da05f404ff0d02b3e70339bf6c5df78385" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The image here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and 9000.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The E-PL3 contains the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The younger E-PL3 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f81ea/f81ea52be10960a8c08c76f436efba7b69a940ef" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42686/426864f7f0a8e58e73ccc9eaa69a67cf84b83a16" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-09-20 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $399 | $300 |