Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PL3 was released 3 years prior to the TG-850 iHS which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-PL3 grades against the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PL3 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-PL3
TG-850 iHS | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | September 2011 | Newer by 28 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PL3 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL3 features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL3 and the TG-850 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and TG-850 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The pic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL3 and TG-850 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL3 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-PL3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-09-20 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic VI | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4616 x 3464 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 313 grams (0.69 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $399 | $250 |