Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL3 was manufactured 7 months prior to the TG-1 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PL3 scores against the TG-1 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PL3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-PL3
TG-1 iHS | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Newer by 7 months |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PL3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL3 versus the TG-1 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/418c4/418c4a837d0a1bd5e5f4ab58f40c91c369bc5ed0" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and TG-1 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e25ac/e25acdfdd1ed8a199f644bdbe02549db53657399" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PL3 provides the bigger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh less difficult. The more aged E-PL3 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7899/e78996fb1bc93b4f91b008d419670d723a4324ff" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88c88/88c88743d5699d6fdddb1a36ce0ffef2dfbda75c" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-09-20 | 2012-05-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic VI | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 313 grams (0.69 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 350 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $399 | $399 |