Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very close but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL3 was announced 21 months prior to the TG-2 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-PL3 scores versus the TG-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-PL3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL3
| TG-2 iHS | E-PL3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | September 2011 | Fresher by 21 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-PL3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL3 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL3 and the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and TG-2 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL3 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL3 contains the larger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-PL3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-09-20 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Truepic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $380 |