Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL3 was introduced 8 months after the VG-110 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL3 matches up against the VG-110 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus VG-110
E-PL3 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | February 2011 | More modern by 8 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-PL3
VG-110 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus VG-110
E-PL3 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the VG-110.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and VG-110 is 88 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and VG-110.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with the identical MP but different sensor sizes. The E-PL3 contains the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The more recent E-PL3 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus VG-110 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-09-20 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 105g (0.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 170 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $150 |