Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10548/105481727825cb9cec94d025b6a727750d258e12" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic FP8, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and FP8 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL3 was manufactured 2 years after the FP8 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-PL3 matches up against the FP8 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Panasonic FP8
E-PL3 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 27 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus E-PL3
FP8 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic FP8
E-PL3 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 comes with outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP8 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic FP8 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL3 versus the FP8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d84d/1d84d7247910bfe856b74f4e495316ead365d679" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and FP8 is 88 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4df2/d4df287ba21fd628e340b77afdbead06fe8d8732" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL3 and FP8.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The E-PL3 provides the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more recent E-PL3 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0864f/0864fe20cdf64176731d7be068320b30b5a2e416" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1990e/1990e15434edf8e0f233b0521af6ad68dadfa30b" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-09-20 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic VI | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $399 | $300 |