Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Released June 2014
- New Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") come with different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL3 was manufactured 3 years before the FZ1000 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-PL3 scores against the FZ1000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Panasonic FZ1000
E-PL3 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-PL3
FZ1000 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2014 | September 2011 | More recent by 33 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic FZ1000
E-PL3 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 comes with outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has specifications of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the FZ1000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and FZ1000 is 88 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL3 and FZ1000.
To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ1000 will deliver more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-09-20 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 831g (1.83 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | 499 | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 360 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $800 |