Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-PL3 and Pentax RZ10, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the RZ10 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and RZ10 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL3 was launched 3 months later than the RZ10 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-PL3 matches up versus the RZ10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Pentax Optio RZ10. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Pentax RZ10
E-PL3 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus E-PL3
RZ10 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Pentax RZ10
E-PL3 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | July 2011 | Same age | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL3 has got outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ10 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL3 and Pentax RZ10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL3 and the RZ10.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and RZ10 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and RZ10.
All in all, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL3 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Pentax RZ10 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313 grams (0.69 lbs) | 178 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 178 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $399 | $200 |