Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL3 was announced 4 months earlier than the WG-2 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL3 matches up against the WG-2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Pentax Optio WG-2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Pentax WG-2
E-PL3 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-PL3
WG-2 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Pentax WG-2
E-PL3 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2012 | Same generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 provides outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b097e/b097e08c9164dfc5e2d58f4b83f43977ae0dee9f" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and WG-2 is 88 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c6f/d4c6f688b77c07b1212d04b15ba8c4f9119409e7" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and WG-2.
As you can see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL3 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-2 will show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cae3/8cae37e33390f27ac72280fcebed3cf69620e3e4" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68324/68324264b98e483cb68e9c8d21a3026d48a545c2" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-09-20 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 313 gr (0.69 lb) | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 260 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $399 | $350 |