Clicky

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-PL3 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-PL3 was unveiled 23 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-PL3 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL3 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedSeptember 2011November 2009Fresher by 23 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL3

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro E-PL3 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL3 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PL3 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL3 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 88 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL3 has got the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF harder. The more recent E-PL3 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography details
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
55
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution (12 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Street photography camera
84
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
62
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography highlights
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
slow fps (6.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
terrible battery power (300 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (320 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL3
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
44
does not have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery power (300 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
49
has built in flash
bad battery pack (320 shots)
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL3
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
61
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
terrible battery power (300 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse mode
46
you can focus manually
screen is a good size (3 inch)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (320 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging details
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
20
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PL3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL3 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus PEN E-PL3Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL3 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2011-09-20 2009-11-10
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic VI GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 50mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 180s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/3200s
Continuous shutter speed 6.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format AVCHD, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 313g (0.69 pounds) 453g (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.9 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots 320 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $399 $566