Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- Later Model is Samsung NX500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL3 and Samsung NX300, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and NX300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL3 was launched 3 years prior to the NX300 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-PL3 grades vs the NX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Samsung NX300
E-PL3 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus E-PL3
NX300 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | Newer by 26 months |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Samsung NX300
E-PL3 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL3 has got external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL3 and Samsung NX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the NX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcccb/fcccb96607cfb3e109fd9482c2734bf489ace4e6" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and NX300 is 88 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6953/a69530213a5e9198d64b9f2b9497d1ad24a9c446" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and NX300.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL3 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX300 will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-PL3 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5099/b5099f4f1304adc34254c7e077d40d05362e997b" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bff7f/bff7fa84a190bf0975ec27ace432d7071451da55" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Samsung NX300 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-09-20 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic VI | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | 499 | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 330 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $399 | $750 |