Clicky

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230

Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL2
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Previous Model is Sony A200
  • Replacement is Sony A290
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony A230, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the A230 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and A230 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-PL3 was unveiled 2 years after the A230 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-PL3 grades against the A230 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Sony A230

 E-PL3 A230 
ReleasedSeptember 2011May 2009Newer by 29 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus E-PL3

 A230 E-PL3 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony A230

 E-PL3 A230 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL3 has got outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Sony A230 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony A230 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL3 against the A230.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and A230 is 88 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and A230.

Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL3 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-PL3 will provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger E-PL3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Portrait photography details
Sony A230 Portrait photography details
60
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
54
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PL3
Street photography with Sony A230
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
67
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography advice
Sony A230 Sports photography advice
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
slow fps (6.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
low battery (300 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
46
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
terrible battery life (230 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Travel photography details
Sony A230 Travel photography details
44
lack of Time Lapse function
low battery (300 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (230 shots)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Landscape photography details
Sony A230 Landscape photography details
61
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
low battery (300 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
51
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
terrible battery life (230 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging factors
Sony A230 Vlogging factors
34
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic port
9
can't record video
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL3 and Sony A230
 Olympus PEN E-PL3Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-PL3 Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2011-09-20 2009-05-18
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic VI Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 6.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/160s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format AVCHD, Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 313g (0.69 pounds) 490g (1.08 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 52 63
DXO Color Depth score 20.9 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 11.4
DXO Low light score 499 531
Other
Battery life 300 images 230 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $399 $569