Clicky

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390

Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL2
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Revealed July 2010
  • Old Model is Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PL3 versus Sony A390, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-PL3 was announced 14 months after the A390 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL3 grades against the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Sony A390

 E-PL3 A390 
RevealedSeptember 2011July 2010More modern by 14 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-PL3

 A390 E-PL3 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony A390

 E-PL3 A390 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-PL3 versus Sony A390 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the A390.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and A390 is 88 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and A390.

As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL3 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A390 will produce more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PL3 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A390 Portrait photography highlights
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
72
focusing manually
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Street photography information
Sony A390 Street photography information
84
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
76
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography features
Sony A390 Sports photography features
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
60
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
bad battery (230 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL3
Travel photography with Sony A390
44
does not have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
53
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
bad battery (230 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Landscape photography advice
Sony A390 Landscape photography advice
61
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery (300 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
61
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
bad battery (230 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging details
Sony A390 Vlogging details
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
9
can't record video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL3 and Sony A390
 Olympus PEN E-PL3Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL3 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2011-09-20 2010-07-28
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Truepic VI Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 6.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/160 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format AVCHD, Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 313 gr (0.69 lb) 549 gr (1.21 lb)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 52 66
DXO Color Depth rating 20.9 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 11.5
DXO Low light rating 499 607
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 230 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $399 $500