Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900
88 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-PL3 versus Sony T900, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL3 was announced 2 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-PL3 matches up against the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Sony T900
| E-PL3 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 32 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-PL3
| T900 | E-PL3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Sony T900
| E-PL3 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL3 comes with external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL3 versus Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL3 against the T900.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and T900 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and T900.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor sizing. The E-PL3 includes the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh easier. The younger E-PL3 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-PL3 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Truepic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $399 | $300 |