Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0357c/0357cbda75a51ce60b8a43bdd7b965e47e9769e6" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL5 front Olympus PEN E-PL5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL5 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL5 was revealed 2 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-PL5 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL5 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 33 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-PL5
Tough-3000 | E-PL5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL5 | Tough-3000 |
---|
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL5 offers exterior measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL5 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL5 vs the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60368/603686927ca4747244b794183b2666ae16b1e7fc" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL5 and Tough-3000 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f067/8f067c60a54116fac6e286510cd1fbab4cea673d" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL5 and Tough-3000.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL5 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL5 will offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-PL5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74e69/74e6921183fbfb05f08e3523cd3084e18311dfb4" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ce5/55ce53631f094ac07946b8038c396742a5099c43" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 grams (0.72 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $400 | $0 |