Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PL5 and Olympus TG-3, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL5 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PL5 was brought out 18 months earlier than the TG-3 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-PL5 scores against the TG-3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL5 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Olympus TG-3
E-PL5 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-PL5
TG-3 | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | September 2012 | Newer by 18 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Olympus TG-3
E-PL5 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Same display resolution |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL5 has got outside measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL5 and Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-PL5 against the TG-3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL5 and TG-3 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL5 and TG-3.
Clearly, both the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The E-PL5 features the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field easier. The more aged E-PL5 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2014-03-31 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 330 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $400 | $350 |