Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0357c/0357cbda75a51ce60b8a43bdd7b965e47e9769e6" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL5 front Olympus PEN E-PL5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL5 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL5 was introduced 15 months after the VR-320 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-PL5 grades against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Olympus VR-320
E-PL5 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 15 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-PL5
VR-320 | E-PL5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Olympus VR-320
E-PL5 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL5 comes with external measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL5 and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec00a/ec00a8cadeab1cd87f84f45ae5a2172c2ba1a859" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and VR-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b636f/b636fc2911d3a48bc38cc0d6f57dd93e0c9aa449" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The image here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL5 and VR-320.
Plainly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL5 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL5 will produce extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-PL5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c27df/c27dfbba69c987df997fc4957b83faf6630dddcf" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00b97/00b973141c6b92530e46ba54dce55fca316cc549" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $400 | $179 |