Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0357c/0357cbda75a51ce60b8a43bdd7b965e47e9769e6" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL5 front Olympus PEN E-PL5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-PL5 versus Olympus VR-340, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL5 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is fairly close but the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL5 was released 9 months later than the VR-340 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-PL5 grades vs the VR-340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL5 and Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Olympus VR-340
E-PL5 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 9 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-PL5
VR-340 | E-PL5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Olympus VR-340
E-PL5 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL5 comes with physical measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL5 versus Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL5 vs the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2ec4/a2ec4abc3bcf263741d3e3e71d2bfe33044abd9e" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and VR-340 is 88 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f55dc/f55dcdbc86d91343d7fe8ffa0c9295090b145163" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL5 and VR-340.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-PL5 uses the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The newer E-PL5 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4928e/4928ea66130e95e0997d64cd270675e90f8621d1" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/580d8/580d814fb52e0e939b47a6c6377705dd11e92c8b" alt="Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL5 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Olympus VR-340 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 grams (0.72 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $400 | $130 |