Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8
88 Imaging
51 Features
72 Overall
59
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and FP8 (12MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and FP8 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL5 was unveiled 3 years after the FP8 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-PL5 grades vs the FP8 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Panasonic FP8
| E-PL5 | FP8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 39 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus E-PL5
| FP8 | E-PL5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Panasonic FP8
| E-PL5 | FP8 |
|---|
Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL5 has outer dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Panasonic FP8 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL5 against the FP8.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and FP8 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL5 and FP8.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL5 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL5 will deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-PL5 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-PL5 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 151g (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 889 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $400 | $300 |