Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
59 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Announced June 2008
- Succeeded the Pentax K10D
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL5 and Pentax K20D, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-PL5 (16MP) and the K20D (15MP) is relatively close but the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and K20D (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL5 was launched 4 years after the K20D which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K20D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-PL5 grades versus the K20D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Pentax K20D. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Pentax K20D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Pentax K20D
| E-PL5 | K20D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2012 |  | June 2008 | More modern by 52 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K20D over the Olympus E-PL5
| K20D | E-PL5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Pentax K20D
| E-PL5 | K20D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL5 enjoys external dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Pentax K20D has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL5 and Pentax K20D in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL5 vs the K20D.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL5 and K20D is 88 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL5 and K20D.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL5 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL5 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher E-PL5 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PL5 vs Pentax K20D Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Pentax K20D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Pentax K20D |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2008-06-25 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4672 x 3104 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 325g (0.72 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 72 | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | 889 | 639 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | D-LI50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $700 |