Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60


77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

The E-PL5 was revealed 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PL5 grades versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 35 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL5 has got external dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL5 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 88 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The picture below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL5 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL5 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL5 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $400 | $566 |