Clicky

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
88
Imaging
52
Features
72
Overall
60
Olympus PEN E-PL5 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
51
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus E-PL5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
  • Launched September 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-PL5 was revealed 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PL5 grades versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL5 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
ReleasedSeptember 2012November 2009Newer by 35 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL5

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro E-PL5 
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL5 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL5 has got external dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL5 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 88 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The picture below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL5 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL5 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL5 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL5
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
71
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low resolution sensor (12MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL5 Street photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography factors
85
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides focus via touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL5 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography highlights
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
has no phase detect autofocus
31
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery pack (320 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL5 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography factors
75
provides focus via touch
megapixel count good (16MP)
selfie friendly display
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
49
flash built-in
terrible battery pack (320 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL5 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography advice
74
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
46
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3")
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (320 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL5 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Vlogging camera
78
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have mic port
20
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus PEN E-PL5Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PL5 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2012-09-17 2009-11-10
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 325g (0.72 pounds) 453g (1.00 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 889 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 pictures 320 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $400 $566