Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL5 was released 2 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL5 grades against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | March 2010 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PL5
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL5 comes with exterior dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-PL5 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 88 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL5 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PL5 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-PL5 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 410 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $400 | $349 |