Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL5 was brought out 4 years later than the A200 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-PL5 grades vs the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Sony A200
E-PL5 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | July 2008 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-PL5
A200 | E-PL5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Sony A200
E-PL5 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL5 comes with exterior dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL5 compared to the A200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and A200 is 88 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL5 and A200.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL5 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-PL5 will resolve extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-PL5 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 572g (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 889 | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $400 | $100 |