Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200
88 Imaging
51 Features
72 Overall
59
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PL5 was brought out 4 years later than the A200 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-PL5 grades vs the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Sony A200
| E-PL5 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 | July 2008 | Fresher by 51 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-PL5
| A200 | E-PL5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Sony A200
| E-PL5 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL5 comes with exterior dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL5 compared to the A200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and A200 is 88 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL5 and A200.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL5 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-PL5 will resolve extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-PL5 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 572g (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 889 | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $100 |