Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200
88 Imaging
51 Features
72 Overall
59
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL5 was brought out 4 years later than the A200 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-PL5 grades vs the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Sony A200
| E-PL5 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 | July 2008 | Fresher by 51 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-PL5
| A200 | E-PL5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Sony A200
| E-PL5 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL5 comes with exterior dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL5 compared to the A200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and A200 is 88 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL5 and A200.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL5 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-PL5 will resolve extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-PL5 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 572g (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 889 | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $100 |