Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus SH-2, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL6 was launched 7 months prior to the SH-2 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-PL6 matches up vs the SH-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus SH-2
E-PL6 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-PL6
SH-2 | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | ![]() | August 2014 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus SH-2
E-PL6 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL6 has got external measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus SH-2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL6 against the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/936f7/936f79b8acbd7b0a9bc63325aa680a7db75aaf82" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL6 and SH-2 is 88 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68fad/68fad5cd9a4d060a50aeccdcba812c7e01b6a0fc" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The picture here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL6 and SH-2.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PL6 features the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field easier. The more aged E-PL6 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16bd2/16bd2809e2d409f0ffb4f024831a44fd67d075be" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da305/da3058063daf6626043e7c00aeb85b5446c0b786" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-08-01 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 380 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $399 |