Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Updated by Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-PL6 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL6 was unveiled 2 years after the TG-320 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-PL6 scores versus the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus TG-320
E-PL6 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 32 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-PL6
TG-320 | E-PL6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus TG-320
E-PL6 | TG-320 |
---|
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL6 features external measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL6 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL6 versus the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e976/5e9765d1faccfa01ded726d6167c4bb5a2de67cb" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL6 and TG-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43340/43340302c0f8f90c60ced6cc936442ccccd32c40" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL6 and TG-320.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL6 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-PL6 will show greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher E-PL6 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b58fb/b58fbcef2bd7ce888d6739936beb85a84eea23ed" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c371/5c3710c824573c12565aef2d1b46fde245f94aed" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus TG-320 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-08-01 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 150 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $300 | $0 |