Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced August 2014
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-PL6 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL6 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL6 was revealed 2 years after the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-PL6 scores vs the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL6 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 31 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-PL6
TG-820 iHS | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+570k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL6 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL6 has got external measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL6 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PL6 versus the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fd51/5fd51ef34803c293d5c5cee91a0e487e1ef23ccc" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL6 and TG-820 iHS is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a51ea/a51ea301a41a2bb87aa70a35ca597b45ffb96511" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL6 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL6 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL6 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger E-PL6 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f3bd/7f3bd2c63cd55448c00bf16c0d2300fbee5d7f2d" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd86e/dd86ebadbfccb43267a46a544612e4d9a39ec43b" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-08-01 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 220 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $500 |