Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced August 2014
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is pretty close but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL6 was released 19 months later than the TG-830 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL6 grades versus the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL6 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-PL6 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 19 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-PL6
TG-830 iHS | E-PL6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-PL6 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL6 provides external dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL6 vs the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fadc/2fadc1352735c0b419921539eb7cadee66481407" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL6 and TG-830 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/077bf/077bfe784f8a352706b4f657fcc30b851406aef9" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL6 and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-PL6 uses the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh less difficult. The newer E-PL6 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/560fe/560fe099ed7614379de4d2e86c7ef98ee22cae59" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09161/091618aa3cef93250896d49e43faa123dc28858f" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-08-01 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lbs) | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $0 |