Clicky

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62
Olympus PEN E-PL6 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-PL6
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
  • Revealed August 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-PL6 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-PL6 was released 20 months later than the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL6 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-PL6 XZ-2 iHS 
LaunchedAugust 2014December 2012Fresher by 20 months
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL6

 XZ-2 iHS E-PL6 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-PL6 XZ-2 iHS 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL6 features exterior measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL6 vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL6 and XZ-2 iHS is 88 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL6 and XZ-2 iHS.

As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL6 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL6 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PL6 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL6 Portrait photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography features
71
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
46
manual focus
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL6 as a Street photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
85
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
includes focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
66
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
sensor is small (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PL6
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL6 Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography features
85
includes focus via touch
decent megapixels (16MP)
display is selfie friendly
61
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL6 Landscape photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
80
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
55
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL6
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
36
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external microphone support
does not have a selfie friendly display
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL6 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL6 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus PEN E-PL6Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL6 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2014-08-01 2012-12-18
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 35 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 325g (0.72 lb) 346g (0.76 lb)
Physical dimensions 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life 360 shots 340 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $300 $450