Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL6 was released 4 years after the FX75 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-PL6 matches up vs the FX75 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Panasonic FX75
E-PL6 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 51 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-PL6
FX75 | E-PL6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Panasonic FX75
E-PL6 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL6 enjoys physical measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL6 against the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e990a/e990aa419225d47fea18b601592135411adc1e73" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL6 and FX75 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b104/8b104e1e2b052cf7690f26d1fe181bdccba185ca" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL6 and FX75.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL6 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL6 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL6 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ec03/0ec039622598fd5b7d946a669b49e434b5144279" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59e97/59e9781ea6f4d362c3cb6aa81748116423e1f4d3" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-08-01 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 grams (0.72 lbs) | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $300 | $139 |