Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced August 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL6 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL6 was announced 4 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL6 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL6 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2014 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 58 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL6
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL6 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL6 enjoys external dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PL6 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd738/cd738aec6029c82862250f2bcc0f9ff727414233" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL6 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 88 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb90/eeb908689879d156902e56536f20d8fa041dd936" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL6 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL6 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL6 will deliver more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern E-PL6 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fbcb/2fbcb3bddc081c4fcb046b5da8f22b29ffb249ef" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72e07/72e07dd67a725d6fa9be32894ba64ef8ff42fb8d" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-08-01 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 320 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $300 | $566 |