Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Released August 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL6 was manufactured 2 years after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-PL6 scores against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PL6 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 31 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-PL6
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PL6 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL6 enjoys outer dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-PL6 compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60b01/60b012bcd80b0e1ad16deddb9eb8224f5189c048" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL6 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 88 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98818/9881883e698b48ef3e260bb3eed989286c65f7ea" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL6 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PL6 has got the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder. The younger E-PL6 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05c48/05c487e9de175e782b38d94a8151d81e1dee566b" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8788a/8788a23d98ba87fd588ff1207966b944e924bcb2" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-08-01 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 400 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $871 |