Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62


91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80

Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and WG-70 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

The E-PL6 was unveiled 6 years prior to the WG-70 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-PL6 matches up versus the WG-70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Ricoh WG-70
E-PL6 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus E-PL6
WG-70 | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2014 | Newer by 67 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh WG-70
E-PL6 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL6 has got physical measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL6 and the WG-70.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL6 and WG-70 is 88 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The picture underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL6 and WG-70.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PL6 provides the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-PL6 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-08-01 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $280 |