Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000
88 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced August 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Released August 2013
- Renewed by Sony a3500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-PL6 versus Sony A3000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the A3000 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and A3000 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL6 was launched 12 months after the A3000 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-PL6 matches up versus the A3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Sony Alpha A3000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Sony A3000
| E-PL6 | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2014 | August 2013 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Olympus E-PL6
| A3000 | E-PL6 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Sony A3000
| E-PL6 | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL6 has exterior measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Sony A3000 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL6 versus Sony A3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL6 against the A3000.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL6 and A3000 is 88 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The image here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL6 and A3000.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL6 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A3000 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-PL6 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony A3000 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Sony Alpha A3000 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2014-08-01 | 2013-08-27 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lb) | 411 gr (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1068 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | 470 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $398 |