Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900
88 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Released August 2014
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-PL6 and Sony T900, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-PL6 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL6 was introduced 5 years after the T900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-PL6 matches up against the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Sony T900
| E-PL6 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2014 | February 2009 | Newer by 67 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-PL6
| T900 | E-PL6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Sony T900
| E-PL6 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL6 has external dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL6 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL6 and the T900.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL6 and T900 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The image below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL6 and T900.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL6 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL6 will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer E-PL6 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-PL6 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-08-01 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 325 grams (0.72 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $300 |