Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3
86 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched September 2014
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL6
- Successor is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-PL7 and Olympus SH-3, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL7 (16MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is very close but the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL7 was announced 17 months prior to the SH-3 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PL7 grades against the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Olympus SH-3
| E-PL7 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-PL7
| SH-3 | E-PL7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | September 2014 | More modern by 17 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Olympus SH-3
| E-PL7 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL7 provides outer dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL7 and Olympus SH-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL7 vs the SH-3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL7 and SH-3 is 86 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL7 and SH-3.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-PL7 offers the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field easier. The more aged E-PL7 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-09-01 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 873 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 380 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $499 | $579 |