Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889c2/889c2b7c2818307cae4014173a151fbd44cdaeb0" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL7 front Olympus PEN E-PL7 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL6
- New Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PL7 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL7 was manufactured 4 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-PL7 scores versus the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL7 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-PL7
Tough-3000 | E-PL7 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL7 | Tough-3000 |
---|
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL7 provides physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL7 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL7 against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29813/2981336679c27af472a433e756eac2fadbc1587b" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL7 and Tough-3000 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03488/0348829125e2798aed63cd05698f1b2171854054" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL7 and Tough-3000.
All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL7 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL7 will give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-PL7 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e508/1e508a2e07f6c704057bdc59276f8ec0ebb24b20" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ccf7/0ccf74e8186846e65a906f058dc0b471da74d465" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2014-09-01 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 873 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $499 | $0 |