Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2014
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL6
- Successor is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL7 was announced 21 months later than the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-PL7 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL7 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PL7 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | December 2012 | Fresher by 21 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL7
XZ-2 iHS | E-PL7 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PL7 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL7 has outer measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL7 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL7 and XZ-2 iHS is 86 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL7 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL7 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL7 will show greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL7 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-09-01 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 873 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 340 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $499 | $450 |