Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889c2/889c2b7c2818307cae4014173a151fbd44cdaeb0" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL7 front Olympus PEN E-PL7 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2014
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL6
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-PL7 versus Panasonic ZS200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL7 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL7 was released 4 years before the ZS200 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL7 matches up versus the ZS200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-PL7 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-PL7
ZS200 | E-PL7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2014 | More recent by 42 months |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+203k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Panasonic ZS200
E-PL7 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL7 offers outer measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL7 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL7 against the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b791/6b791833c769c58ed2a733fa5370ed5aa0835e06" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL7 and ZS200 is 86 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95b64/95b6402a84eb6e6c841f9af76fbf86beda757941" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL7 and ZS200.
As you can tell, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL7 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-PL7 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f456/3f456fbf7123f0ceaef28471b74e227e37df72bf" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb926/cb926d3f1eea8aa059df549a70b4dcfdcead3a96" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-09-01 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 873 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 370 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $499 | $800 |