Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200
86 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2014
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL6
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-PL7 versus Panasonic ZS200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL7 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL7 was released 4 years before the ZS200 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL7 matches up versus the ZS200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Panasonic ZS200
| E-PL7 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-PL7
| ZS200 | E-PL7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | September 2014 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1240k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+203k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Panasonic ZS200
| E-PL7 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL7 offers outer measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL7 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL7 against the ZS200.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL7 and ZS200 is 86 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL7 and ZS200.
As you can tell, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL7 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-PL7 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-09-01 | 2018-02-13 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 357g (0.79 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 873 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 370 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $499 | $800 |