Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889c2/889c2b7c2818307cae4014173a151fbd44cdaeb0" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL7 front Olympus PEN E-PL7 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7a1/8a7a180937ea0d2aac292604a641c6ce9f80a13b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched September 2014
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL6
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-PL7 and Panasonic FX48, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL7 was announced 5 years after the FX48 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PL7 matches up vs the FX48 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Panasonic FX48
E-PL7 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 69 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-PL7
FX48 | E-PL7 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Panasonic FX48
E-PL7 | FX48 |
---|
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL7 comes with outside dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has dimensions of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL7 and Panasonic FX48 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL7 vs the FX48.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14da4/14da469a23e40aec338f506e2f8254e8122831e3" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL7 and FX48 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277b3/277b3bcd1c7fa06473dbe7e8400492803aed3a60" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The picture here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL7 and FX48.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL7 with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-PL7 will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The newer E-PL7 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cce6/4cce61fe4892b2ed32f349fef15e93d8363edd86" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/644f5/644f5acae61e371bd8d841a2671984755ce3f953" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-09-01 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lbs) | 150g (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 873 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $499 | $325 |