Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL6
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-PL7 and Sony A200, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL7 was brought out 6 years later than the A200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL7 scores against the A200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL7 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Sony A200
| E-PL7 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | July 2008 | More recent by 75 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-PL7
| A200 | E-PL7 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Sony A200
| E-PL7 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL7 enjoys external dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL7 and Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL7 versus the A200.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL7 and A200 is 86 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL7 and A200.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL7 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus E-PL7 will resolve more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern E-PL7 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-09-01 | 2008-07-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 72 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 873 | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $499 | $100 |