Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220
86 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL6
- New Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-PL7 and Sony W220, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and W220 (12MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL7 was revealed 5 years later than the W220 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-PL7 scores versus the W220 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL7 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery and Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Sony W220
| E-PL7 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 69 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-PL7
| W220 | E-PL7 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Sony W220
| E-PL7 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL7 features external dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL7 and Sony W220 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL7 vs the W220.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL7 and W220 is 86 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL7 and W220.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL7 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL7 will resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-PL7 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-PL7 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-01 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lbs) | 147 grams (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 873 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $499 | $160 |