Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL7
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL8 was brought out 7 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-PL8 scores vs the SP-565UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL8 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 94 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-PL8
SP-565UZ | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL8 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 has outer measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL8 versus the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18fb2/18fb28f11e9370b16fbf6c2edfacea7d4d584e09" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and SP-565UZ is 86 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fbf8/9fbf8347aca227fbac7f835cb25a9bd2b6cde511" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The image here might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL8 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL8 will give you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent E-PL8 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e545/7e545601d91c7e3d65141a8ca45250512eceac9b" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa77a/aa77a2fed0e2cd8229e1580eddeba742ce92b2a3" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lbs) | 413g (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $500 | $400 |