Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL8 was unveiled 6 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-PL8 scores versus the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL8 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2010 | Fresher by 82 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-PL8
Tough-3000 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL8 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL8 has physical measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 and the Tough-3000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and Tough-3000 is 86 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL8 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $500 | $0 |