Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is very close but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL8 was manufactured 2 years later than the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL8 matches up vs the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 33 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-850 iHS | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL8 provides outside dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL8 vs the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/541a0/541a0511c232b967ba5be2a4a33a5652c5939c24" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and TG-850 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/253ea/253ea2eb14ad9601cbf96717d86fcb8e196b59ab" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL8 offers the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The fresher E-PL8 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47a90/47a903392f10a4bf49ea976d74294ecca1d21251" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/612d5/612d514b789f27e055c33c3415866f9d11b8cda6" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $500 | $250 |