Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus XZ-10, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL8 was announced 3 years after the XZ-10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PL8 scores versus the XZ-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus XZ-10
E-PL8 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 45 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-PL8
XZ-10 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus XZ-10
E-PL8 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 comes with external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-PL8 and the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c543f/c543f4292736318bc86dbf07012f8cef266d4647" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and XZ-10 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d13b9/d13b968ad3177e2a9ebddf2e4d3d704e451da844" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and XZ-10.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PL8 will show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35498/35498c0939ce72fcf599cdfd445a40e9f78d65b1" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deff7/deff77085376f1d5d3cc3a26cb2551dc912cdb8c" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 240 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $500 | $428 |