Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus TG-310, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL8 was released 5 years later than the TG-310 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL8 scores vs the TG-310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-310
E-PL8 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 70 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-310 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-310
E-PL8 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL8 enjoys external dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL8 versus the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/818e1/818e18d0b88fc2b6bdba8a7075742613c9a2d209" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and TG-310 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3167e/3167e7f9e149bf77ac5342ed7fa57b9c166e4c27" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and TG-310.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL8 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will render extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern E-PL8 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5cfd/b5cfd3cb9511d3f961669c73cdaf93bb116cfeeb" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fd8c/6fd8cee3a4f061383e6dca92e5dc210b3872cb8e" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-310 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 150 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $500 | $0 |