Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus TG-320, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL8 was introduced 4 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-PL8 matches up against the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-320
E-PL8 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 58 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-320 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-320
E-PL8 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL8 offers outside dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL8 against the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d53b42a7fad980ca0b3d8ecc47536e0a27c07" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and TG-320 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56c1f/56c1f8fa611e4cb35a9b649823eb7d3cec2830f3" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and TG-320.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL8 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL8 will offer more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d4a2/7d4a2a6dea35a06e73c0a3c7eaa1981a57286295" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d75b4/d75b4b9640797f08f8f1e51dddb5f1de04ddc4d8" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-320 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 150 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $0 |