Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL8 was announced 3 years after the TG-630 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-PL8 matches up versus the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 45 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-630 iHS | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL8 offers outer measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL8 versus the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd63f/fd63f8520126a53d5bc31f681fc609113a1097d0" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and TG-630 iHS is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4791/a479166431ade5645f495ff1ce94ea75d13b7156" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PL8 will offer greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-PL8 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c9fa/2c9fad648c80af265d4ba1a1747969b31b4f8c81" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d8cb/8d8cb0dcf4763baac4d7ab13d9574bd977057551" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 220 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $500 | $200 |